The Gujarat High Court (Jodhpur Bench) dismissed a Consumer Protection appeal by Union of India, withdrawn by appellant due to tax effect being less than Rs.1 crore per Circular No. F.No.390/Misc./116/2017-JC.
Application No.01/2019 allowed. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Central/excise Appeal No. 77/2018
Union of India, through the Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax Commissionerate, 142-B, Hiranmagri Sector - 11, Udaipur.
----Appellant
Versus
M/s Hindustan Zinc Ltd., Rampura Agucha, Bhilwara
| ----Respondent | ||
|---|---|---|
| For Appellant(s) | : None present. |
|
| For Respondent(s) | : None present. |
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. INDRAJIT MAHANTY HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
04/11/2019
In view of the Circular No. F.No.390/Misc./116/2017-JC dated 22.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs, the tax effect involved in the present being less than Rs.1 crore, learned counsel appearing for the appellant filed an application seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.
Application No.01/2019 is allowed.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J (INDRAJIT MAHANTY),CJ
14-a.asopa/-
Union of India, through the Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax Commissionerate
M/s Hindustan Zinc Ltd.
Indrajit Mahanty
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
