Disposed

Bholi Devi W/O Shri Bhagirath Mal Raigar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Jul 2019CW/5688/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan permitted the petitioner liberty to address a comprehensive representation to the respondents within two weeks for redressal of her grievances, directed the respondents to decide by a reasoned order within two months if filed, and disposed of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to address comprehensive representation to respondents for redressal of grievances within two weeks.

Bholi Devi W/O Shri Bhagirath Mal Raigar… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5688/2019

¶3

Bholi Devi W/o Shri Bhagirath Mal Raigar, Aged About 58 Years, By Caste Raiger, R/o Chomu Tehsil Chomu District Jaipur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary To The Government Department Of Forest, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest, Rajasthan Van Bhawan, Jaipur.

¶8

Chief Conservator Of Forest, Arawali Bhawan, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur.

¶9

Forest Settlement Officer, Jhotwara Road, Jaipur.

¶10

Deputy Conservator Of Forest, Jhotwara Road, Jaipur.

¶11

District Collector, District Jaipur Rajasthan

¶12

Tehsildar Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur.

¶13

----Respondent

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Sharma For Respondent(s) :

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDRA SINGH SIRADHANA

¶16

Order

¶17

05/07/2019

¶18

After arguing the matter for some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to address a comprehensive representation to the respondents for identical liberty was reserved to the other applicant, namely, Ram Kishore in SBCWP No.2633/2017: Ram Kishore & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., disposed off on 2^nd January, 2018, by a Coordinate Bench of this Court.

¶19

[CW-5688/2019]

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

In view of the above, the petitioner is at liberty to address a comprehensive representation to the State-respondents for redressal of her grievances within two weeks hereinafter.

¶22

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order keeping in view the order dated 2^nd January, 2018 (supra), made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court. The respondents would do the needful to determine the representation as expeditiously as possible; preferably, within two months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶23

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.

¶24

(VEERENDRA SINGH SIRADHANA),J

¶25

SUNIL SOLANKI /19/78

Bholi Devi W/O Shri Bhagirath Mal Raigar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bholi Devi W/O Shri Bhagirath Mal Raigar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dulheram Meena Son of Shri Ramswaroop Meena Vs Assistant Commissioner-I

Abdul Nadim Khan S/O Late Shri Abdul Hafiz Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Dulheram Meena Son of Shri Ramswaroop Meena Vs Assistant Commissioner-I, Devasthan

Ravindra Sharma Son of Shri Ganesh Narain Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Shiv Mahavidyalaya Vs the State of Rajasthan

Smt. Manbhari Devi Shikshan Sansthan Vs National Council for Teacher Education