Petitioner sought quashing of proceedings. Court noted petitioner's death and held the writ petition abated in law, dismissing same accordingly.
Writ petition dismissed as having become abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2163/1990
Mahendra Kumar Acharya
----Petitioner
Versus
State
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.K. Bhargava For Respondent(s) : Ms. Ashish Joshi Mr. Sanjeev Singhal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
05/12/2019
Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner expired and therefore, the writ petition stands abated.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as having become abated.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
SUNIL SOLANKI /19/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of abatement due to the death of the petitioner.
Mahendra Kumar Acharya
State
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
