S N Agarwal v. J Z D U S S
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner in a writ petition has died. Consequently, the Court held the petition abated and dismissed it without addressing any substantive legal questions.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is abated and dismissed.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1493/1999
S N Agarwal
----Petitioner
Versus
J Z D U S S
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Lodha For Respondent(s) : Mr. P.S.Naruka on behalf of Mr. Rupin Kala
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
05/12/2019
Counsel for the petitioner informs that the petitioner has expired.
In view of above, the writ petition is abated and the same is accordingly dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S N Agarwal
- respondent
J Z D U S S
Coram
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/1493/1999
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court