The High Court held that a writ petition challenging a suspension order is not maintainable as the petitioner failed to first seek review under Rule 13(5) or appeal under Rule 22 of the Rules of 1958 before approaching the Court; the petition is disposed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writs No. 21442/2017
Batti Lal Meena
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Raj And Anr
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Sandeep Saxena For Respondent(s) : Dr.A.S.Khangarot
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Judgment / Order
19/01/2019
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
Sandeep/-76
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking revocation of a suspension order is maintainable without first exhausting remedies under the relevant rules of 1958.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Batti Lal Meena
State Of Raj
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
