keeping the person under suspension would be necessary for the purpose of continuance of the case. In other words, if the concerned individual is likely to affect the departmental proceedings or the criminal case pending before the authority or the court by influencing the witnesses, then the suspension may be continued, otherwise the departmental authorities ought to have taken into consideration that 50%/75% of the salary is being pagid to a suspended employee by way of subsistence allowance without taking any work from him. Thus, the concerned person is receiving amount without work. There is other aspect if the concerned authorities are of the view that such a person on account of his alleged misconduct departmental or criminal, is likely to affect the atmosphere of the Officer where he is posted, a decision can always be taken to post the said individual at a different place or transfer him to some other place so that he cannot in any manner disturb or affect the working at other place. Such individual against whom departmental action is being sought to ble taken and are reinstated ought not be placed in sensitive posting place. They ought to be given work wherein there is no direct public involvement and they should continue to work at such place till a verdict is given by competent court deciding the criminal case or in the departmental enquiry.