The High Court held that the petitioner's writ petition regarding Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules amendments had rendered itself infructuous. The petition was dismissed accordingly on 03/01/2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ No. 19358/2018
Panna Lal Jhadola S/o Shri Nag Ji Ramji, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village And Post Thana, Tehsil Sarada, Distt. Udaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Khet Singh Rajpurohit For Respondent(s) : - - -
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
03/01/2019
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the amendment made in Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 2010, the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
Dismissed accordingly.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
(SANGEET LODHA),J
63-Himanshu/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous in view of the amendment in the Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 2010.
Panna Lal Jhadola
State Of Rajasthan
Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur
Registrar (Examination), Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur
Sangeet Lodha
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
