This writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. The court held that since PF and notices for respondent no.4 had not been filed since August 2015, the petition could not be pursued further.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution as PF and notices have not been filed for respondent no.4 since August, 2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writs No. 1776/2011
Jogendra
----Petitioner
Versus
Managing Director And Ors
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Judgment / Order
13/02/2019
PF & notices have not been filed for respondent no.4 since August, 2015.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
Anu/10
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition should be dismissed due to lack of prosecution as PF and notices were not filed for a specific respondent since August 2015.
Jogendra
Managing Director
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
