The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging oral termination of service. The court held that the issue is a question of fact beyond its writ jurisdiction.
Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writs No. 1352/2019
Raju Lal S/o Shri Suraj Mal Sangat, Aged About 42 Years, By Caste Harijan, R/o House No. 1004, Kelgiri Hospital, Jhalana Basti, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.J.R.Chaudhary For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Judgment / Order
21/01/2019
Counsel submits that the petitioner has been orally
terminated.
The question raised is a question of fact which this court will not be able to examine in writ jurisdiction.
Accordingly, in view of above, writ petition is dismissed.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
Sandeep/-80
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court can examine the question of oral termination of service in writ jurisdiction.
Raju Lal S/o Shri Suraj Mal Sangat
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Local Bodies, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
The Director Cum Ex Officio Joint Secretary, Local Self Govt.
Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Jaipur
Dy. Commissioner, Vidhyadhar Nagar Zone, Municipal Corporation, Jaipur
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
