Allowed

Girdhari Lal v. the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Rajasthan HC7 Jan 2019CW/126/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the writ petition in light of a prior judgment in Daulat Ram. The respondent Corporation was directed to reimburse retired employees all dues including retirement benefits, overtime, and night allowance within six months, carrying interest at 6% p.a.

What did the court decide?

Directing the respondent Corporation to reimburse entire dues including retirement benefits, overtime, and night allowance within six months with interest at 6% p.a.

Girdhari Lal Vs the Rajasthan State Road… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ No. 126/2019

¶3

Girdhari Lal S/o Shri Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of Balod Badi, Panchayat Samiti Fatehpur, Shekhawari, Brahmano Ka Mohalla, District Sikar (Rajasthan).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Managing Director, Jaipur.

¶7

The Finance Authority, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur.

¶8

The Executive Director (Engineering), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur.

¶9

The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Bikaner Depot, Bikaner.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sushil Solanki. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suniel Purohit.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

¶13

Order

¶14

07/01/2019

¶15

A copy of the writ petition has been supplied to Mr. Suniel Purohit, learned counsel appearing for the respondentCorporation.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the dispute raised in the present writ petition has already been adjudicated by this Court led by Daulat Ram v. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9687/2015, decided on 1.10.2015 and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be disposed of in light of the said judgment.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-126/2019]

¶19

This Court while deciding the case of Daulat Ram (supra)

¶20

directed as under :-

¶21

“In this background, these writ petitions deserves to be and are hereby allowed. The respondent Corporation is directed to reimburse the entire dues of all its retired employees under all heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, earned leave etc. within a period of six months. The due amount shall carry interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit detailed representations to be concerned officers to settle the accounts and facilitate the assessment of the dues at the earliest.

¶22

No order as to costs.”

¶23

In view of the above, the writ petition is also allowed in the light of judgment in the case of Daulat Ram (supra) with the same directions as quoted hereinbefore.

¶24

(ARUN BHANSALI),J

¶25

60-PKS/-

Girdhari Lal v. the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Girdhari Lal v. the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Puri Vs State of Rajasthan

Vini Soni Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Uma Vyas Vs State of Rajasthan

Bharti Shrimali Vs State of Rajasthan

Vinod Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Ali Vs State of Rajasthan