Petitioner challenged conviction under Section 498-A IPC. He requested sentence reduction due to long trial duration, reconciliation via remarriage, and time served. Court allowed this prayer.
Sentence reduced to the period already undergone; petitioner set at liberty as fines were deposited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision No. 81/2019
Islam S/o Kanti B/c Musalman, R/o Duttwas Ps Duttwas Dist. Tonk Raj. (Petitoner Is Behind The Bar And At Central Sawaimadhopur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through Pp, Raj.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Mituka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
01/03/2019
(2 of 2)
[CRLR-81/2019]
entered into Nikah after obtaining divorce. No purpose would be served in now directing the petitioner to undergo the remaining period of sentence. Prayer is made that the sentence be reduced to the period already undergone.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J.
Arti/5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition pressing for reduction of sentence to the period already undergone in a case involving long delay and reconciliation between parties should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Islam S/o Kanti B/c Musalman
State Of Rajasthan Through Pp, Raj.
PANKAJ BHANDARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
