High Court of Rajasthan partly allowed revision petition against conviction under IPC Sections 326 and 341. Court reduced sentence to period already undergone while upholding conviction and fine.
Sentence reduced to period already undergone; conviction and fine upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision No. 109/2019
Jagannath S/o Gulabji B/c Bhil, R/o Bairagarh At Present Maanpura Ps Bhalta Dist. Jhalawar Raj. (At Present Confined To Sub Dist. Jail Aklera)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through Pp, Raj.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Chawla, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
01/03/2019
(2 of 3)
[CRLR-109/2019]
under Section 341 IPC remained unaltered, fine and sentence in lieu of default of payment of fine remained unaltered.
(3 of 3)
[CRLR-109/2019]
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J.
Arti/120
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sentence for offences under Section 326 and 341 IPC should be reduced considering the petitioner's age and duration of trial.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Jagannath S/o Gulabji B/c Bhil
State Of Rajasthan
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
