This bench allowed a criminal revision petition and quashed conviction orders following an amicable settlement of a matrimonial dispute between the petitioners and the complainant, holding that continued proceedings would amount to an abuse of process.
Judgment and orders passed by the court below were quashed and set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 621/2009
Resident of Jal Wala Kuwa, Behind Atta Mandir, Alwar, P.S. Kotwali, Alwar,
Accused No.1, 2, 3 & 5 in Sub Jail Bandikui & Accused No.4 in Jaipur Central Jail.
----Petitioner Versus State ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Mr. Narendra Kr. Saini. For Complainant(s) : Mr. Mukesh Goyal. For State : Mr. Bhawani Shankar Sharma, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Order
04/09/2019
(2 of 2)
[CRLR-621/2009]
the parties, Court held that continuation of proceedings would tantamount to abuse of process of the Court.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
CHANDAN /131
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the conviction orders can be quashed upon amicable settlement of the dispute by the parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Govinda & Anr. vs. State of RajasthanReferred¶16
Govinda & Anr. vs. State of Raj. 2002(2) WLC (Raj.) 438
Kamal Pathik & Ors.
State
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
