The High Court dismissed a criminal writ petition seeking fair investigation, holding that such grievances are for the Magistrate. The petition was disposed of with liberty to approach the Magistrate.
Petition dismissed; liberty to approach the Magistrate; stay application disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 101/2018
Urmila Nuwal W/o Shri Satyaprakash Nuwal, R/o 2 New Colony, Bundi, District Bundi Raj., Secretary,manav Vikas Santhan, 9 Patel Nagar, Sawai Madhopur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Order
03/09/2019
(2 of 2)
[CRLW-101/2018]
investigation has not been done properly by the Police. For this grievance, the remedy lies before the Magistrate concerned.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Heena/39
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a writ petition when the grievance is regarding improper police investigation.
Where the remedy for improper investigation lies before the Magistrate concerned.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sakiri Vasu vs. State of U.P. & Ors.Referred¶16
Sakiri Vasu vs. State of U.P. & Ors. AIR 2008 SC Page 907 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Urmila Nuwal
State Of Rajasthan
Superintendent Of Police, Tonk
Station House Officer, Police Station Uniyara
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
