Disposed

Kavita Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Rajasthan HC14 Dec 2019CRLR/2144/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2144/2016 relating to services charges. The court noted the petitioner's age and health, and the respondents' agreement, leading to an order to process the claim.

What did the court decide?

Order recorded that the petition is disposed of in view of the petitioner's age and health and the parties' agreement.

Kavita Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr. — Rajasthan HC (2019) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2144/2016

¶3

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB t;iqjA

¶4

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2144/2016

¶5

Kavita Sharma W/o Shri Rajendra Suthar, D/o Shriom Prakash Sharma B/c Khati Brahamin, R/o Near Khatiyo Ka Mandir, Ward No.37, Grdhanpura Kota, Raj.

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.

¶9

Rajendra Suthar S/o Shri Dinesh Suthar B/c Brahamin, R/o Near Mordern School New Market, Rawatbhata Kota, Raj.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

%% mifLFkr %%

¶12

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh

¶13

;kph ds vf/koDrk Jh vkj ch 'kekZ xaBksyk yksd vfHk;kstd Jh vrqy 'kekZ 'kekZ v;kph&ifjoknh ds vf/koDrk Jh lat; xaxokj

¶14

%% vkns'k %% 14-12-2019

¶15

U;k;ky; }kjk %

¶16

v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky;] ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; dze&3] dksVk }kjk izdj.k la[;k 23@2016 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnuakd 8 uoEcj 2016 ftlds rgr izkfFkZ;ka Jherh dfork 'kekZ dh vksj

¶17

¶18

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2144/2016

¶19

ls izLrqr izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 125 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk [kkfjt fd;k x;k] ls O;fFkr gksdj ;g fjohtu ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

¶20

nksuksa i{kksa ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk }kjk fuosnu fd;k x;k fd iwoZ eas ikfjr vkns'k dh ikyuk esa nksuksa i{kdkjku e/;LFkrk dsUnz ds le{k mifLFkr gks pqds gS rFkk e/;LFkrk dk;Zokgh ds nkSjku nksuksa i{kks esa vkil eas le>kSrk gks pqdk gS rFkk jkthukek i=koyh ij miyC/k gSA mudk dFku jgk fd mDr jkthukek esa of.kZr 'krksZ ds vuqlkj vkt izFke fd'r ds :i esa 1]75]000@&:i;s dk fMek.M MªkQ~V Hkh v;kph }kjk ;kph dks lkSaik tk pqdk gSA vr% mDr jkthukek dh jks'kuh esa bl ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k fd, tkus dk fuosnu djrs gSaA

¶21

v;kph ds vf/koDrk }kjk izLrqr fMek.M&MªkQ~V dh izfr dks vfHkys[k ij fy;k tkrk gSA

¶22

v;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dh vksj ls fuosnu fd;k x;k fd i{kdkjksa ds e/; vkil esa jkthukek gks pqdk gS rFkk v;kph }kjk izFke fd'r ds :i esa fn, x;s MhMh ds vfrfjDr 'ks"k jkf'k Hkh 'kh?kz jkthukek dh 'krksZ ds vk/kkj ij vnk dj nh tk;sxhA

¶23

lquk x;k ,oa fopkj fd;k x;kA

¶24

ifj.kker% ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk nksuksa i{kksa dks funsZf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd os muds }kjk fu"ikfnr jkthukek dh 'krksZ ls ck/; jgsaxs rFkk i{kdkjksa ds e/; vU; eqdnesa] tks fofHkUu U;k;ky;ksa esa yfEcr gSa] ds fuLrkj.k ds dze esa vius&vius Lrj ij mfpr dk;Zokgh djsaxs rFkk ,d nwljs dks lg;ksx djsaxs rFkk jkthukek dh 'krksZ dk ikyu ugha fd, tkus ij

¶25

¶26

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2144/2016

¶27

lEcfU/kr i{kdkj vU; i{kdkj ds fo:) fu;ekuqlkj dk;Zokgh djus ds fy, Lora= jgsxkA i{kdkjksa ds e/; fu"ikfnr fyf[kr jkthukek bl fu.kZ; dk Hkkx jgsxkA

¶28

rn~uqlkj LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk

¶29

gSA

¶30

¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr

¶31

ts ,l iaokj@55

Kavita Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kavita Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raghuveer Singh S/O Shri Bharat Singh B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Hari S/O Chhitariya Vs State of Rajasthan

Nemi Chand S/O Bheru Lal B/C Mali Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt Lad Kanwar Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Mahesh Kumar Soni S/O Shri Omprakash Soni B/C Soni Vs Govindram Soni S/O Shri Kailash Chand Soni B/C Soni

Surendra Kumar S/O Ashok Kumar Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan