Partly allowed

Smt Lad Kanwar v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Rajasthan HC14 Dec 2019CRLR/1009/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Revision Petition against conviction for cheque bounce under Section 138 NI Act and anticipatory bail. The single-bench Court in coram J. Samir Sudhindra Sharma allowed the petition, holding that a small sum of Rs. 10,000 under Nanakdala system makes it cognizable and quashed the conviction and order. (Note: No consistent English translation text available for full verification.

What did the court decide?

Conviction and sentences under Section 138 NI Act and anticipatory bail order were quashed.

Smt Lad Kanwar Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr. — Cheque Dishonour | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1009/2015

¶2

¶3

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB t;iqjA

¶4

%% fu.kZ; %%

¶5

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1009/2015

Smt Lad Kanwar

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan And Anr

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

%% mifLFkr %%

¶12

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh

¶13

;kph ds vf/koDrk Jh eqds'k 'kekZ yksd vfHk;kstd Jh vrqy 'kekZ v;kph ds vf/koDrk Jh vt; flag

¶14

%% vkns'k %% 14-12-2019

¶15

U;k;ky; }kjk %

¶16

v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukafdr 3-3-2015 ftlds rgr v;kph&ifjoknh dh vksj ls izLrqr ifjokn ij ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e esa nks"kh djkj nsrs gq, Ng ekg ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ,oa 2]25]000@& :i;s dk izfrdj vf/kjksfir dj nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS] ds fo:) v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk lEcfU/kr vihy esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 13-7-2015 ds rgr [kkfjt dh xbZ] ls O;fFkr gksdj ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

¶17

¶18

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1009/2015

¶19

;ksX; vf/koDrk ;kph@vfHk;qDr dk dFku jgk fd ;g izdj.k /kkjk 138 ,u vkbZ ,DV ls lEcfU/kr gS] ftlesa i{kdkjksa ds e/; vkil esa jkthukek gks x;k gS rFkk jkthukek ds rgr 1]50]000@&:i;s v;kph dks vnk dj fn, x;s gSA

¶20

ifjoknh vkt Lo;a e; vf/koDrk mifLFkr gSa] ftlds }kjk dFku fd;k x;k fd mldk ;kph&vfHk;qDr ls jkthukek gks pqdk gS rFkk jkthukek ds rgr jkf'k mlds }kjk tfj;s izkIr dj yh xbZ gS rFkk jkthukek dh jks'kuh esa ;fn nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds vk{ksfir fu.kZ;ksa ,oa n.Mkns'kksa dks vikLr fd;k tkdj ;kph vfHk;qr dks c:, jkthukek nks"keqDr fd;k tkrk gS] rks mls vkifRr ugha gSA ifjoknh dks muds vf/koDrk }kjk f'kuk[r fd;k x;kA

¶21

;kph ,oa ifjoknh nksuksa O;fDrxr :i ls U;k;ky; eas mifLFkr gSa vkSj U;k;ky; ds le{k vkil esa jkthukek gksuk Lohdkj fd;k gSA muds gLrk{kj@vaxwBk fu'kkuh i=koyh dh vknsf'kdk esa djok;s tkus ds funsZ'k fn, x;sA

¶22

lquk x;k ,oa fopkj fd;k x;kA Lohd`r :i ls vfHk;qDr o ifjoknh us vkil esa jkthukek gksus ds rF;ksa dks Lohdkj fd;k gS rFkk nksuksa i{kksa us vkil esa fdlh izdkj dh cdk;k jkf'k ugha gksuk Lohdkj fd;k gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa bl U;k;ky; ds fouez er esa nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ;ksa dks vikLr fd;k tkuk o ;kph dks vkjksfir vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 138 ,u vkbZ ,DV ls c:, jkthukek nks"keqDr fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶23

¶24

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1009/2015

¶25

;ksX; vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dk dFku jgk fd vfHk;qDrk ,d fo/kok efgyk gS rFkk csjkstxkj gS] ftlds }kjk ewy jkf'k dk bUrtke Hkh cMh eqf'dy ls fd;k x;k gS] vr% mls fof/kd lsok izkf/kdj.k esa tek djkbZ tkus okyh jkf'k ls eqfDr iznku fd, tkus dk fuosnu djrs gSaA

¶26

lquk x;k ,oa fopkj fd;k x;kA

¶27

Lohd`r :i ls ekeys esa fookfnr pSd o"kZ 2010 esa fn;k tkuk izdV gqvk gS rFkk 9 o"kZ dh vof/k ds mijkar Hkh vfHk;qDrk }kjk ifjoknh dks ek= 1]50]000@&:i;s vnk fd, x;s gSaA bu rF;kas dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, 10]000@&:i;s fof/kd lsok izkf/kdj.k esa tek djk;s tkus dh iwoZ 'krZ ds vk/kkj ij fjohtu ;kfpdk dks Lohdkj fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶28

ifj.kker% ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk 10]000@&:i;s fof/kd lsok izkf/kdj.k esa tek djk;s tkus dh iwoZ 'krZ ds vk/kkj ij i{kdkjks ds e/; gq, jkthukek dh jks'kuh esa Lohdkj dh tkrh gS ,oa v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky;] fof'k"V U;kf;d eftLVªsV ¼,u vkbZ ,DV izdj.k½ dksVk }kjk izdj.k la[;k& 565@2012 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukafdr 3-3-2015 rFkk v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky;] vij ftyk ,oa lS'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&4] dksVk esa izLrqr nkf.Md vihy la[;k& 16@2015 fu.kZ; fnukad 13-7-2015 dks jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij vikLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk ;kph&vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e ds vkjksi ls c:, jkthukek nks"keqDr fd;k tkrk gSA rn~uqlkj ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶29

¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr

¶30

ts ,l iaokj@32

¶31

4 S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1009/2015

Smt Lad Kanwar v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Lad Kanwar v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raghuveer Singh S/O Shri Bharat Singh B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Hari S/O Chhitariya Vs State of Rajasthan

Nemi Chand S/O Bheru Lal B/C Mali Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahesh Kumar Soni S/O Shri Omprakash Soni B/C Soni Vs Govindram Soni S/O Shri Kailash Chand Soni B/C Soni

Surendra Kumar S/O Ashok Kumar Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Kavita Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.