Dismissed

Bachchu S/O Balveer v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Dec 2019CRLMP/6453/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous petition, the petitioner sought fair investigation. The court held that the remedy for grievances regarding police investigation lies before the Magistrate, not the High Court, referring Sakiri Vasu. The petition was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of; petitioner may approach the concerned Magistrate for inquiry on investigation progress.

Bachchu S/O Balveer Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6453/2019

¶3

Bachchu S/o Balveer, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village Sakarghat, Tehsil Masalpur, District Karauli.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home Department, Secretary, Jaipur.

¶7

1. Director General Of Police, Phq, Rajasthan. 3. Inspector General Of Police, Bharatpur Range, Bharatpur. 4. Superintendent Of Police, Karauli. 5. Station House Officer, Police Station Mahila Thana, Karauli.

¶8

1. Atlab S/o Karan Gurjar, R/o Bhoodkhera, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli.

¶9

1. Darab S/o Karan, R/o Bhoodkhera, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli.

¶10

1. Prem S/o Babu, R/o Bhoodkhera, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli.

¶11

1. Fatte S/o Sona, R/o Bhoodkhera, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli.

¶12

1. Rajendra S/o Roopa Gurjar, R/o Vindapura, Kurgaov, Ps Karauli.

¶13

1. The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Huan Trafficking Jaipur. ----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.R. Baisla. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Ola, P.P.

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

Order

(2 of 2)

[CRLMP-6453/2019]

06/12/2019

Petitioner has preferred this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking fair investigation.

¶21

Apex Court in “Sakiri Vasu vs. State of U.P. & Ors. AIR

¶22

2008 SC Page 907” has held that the Judicial Magistrate has very wide powers to enquire about the investigation and for monitoring the investigation to ensure that the investigation is done properly. Apex Court has further observed that the High Court should discourage the practice of filing Writ Petitions or petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. simply because a person has a grievance that investigation has not been done properly by the Police. For this grievance, the remedy lies before the Magistrate concerned.

¶23

In view of the above, I am not inclined to entertain the misc. petition, the same is disposed of. Stay application stands disposed of.

¶24

However, petitioner would be free to approach the concerned Magistrate to inquire about the progress of the investigation.

¶25

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

¶26

MG/39

Bachchu S/O Balveer v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bachchu S/O Balveer v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohini Devi Verma Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Nityanand Sharma S/O Shri Harsahay Sharma B/C Brahmin Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh S/O Ramdayal B/C Dhaked Vs State of Rajasthan

Akanksha Rastogi D/O Rakesh Rastogi, W/O Nagendrapal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Chanda Kumari D/O Shri Harendra Sah, W/O Shri Ramesh Kumawat Vs State of Rajasthan

Gajanand S/O Shri Hathiram Behara B/C Harijan Vs State of Rajasthan