Disposed

Dimple Kumari v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Nov 2019CRLMP/6073/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur bench, addressed the petitioners' claim of grave threat to life and liberty from the family of the opposite party. The single judge directed the Superintendent of Police to hear grievances and provide safety measures, deeming it improper for individuals to take law into their own hands despite living

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Superintendent of Police, Pali to appear before the petitioners, hear their grievance regarding threat from relatives, and take appropriate steps for their safety and security.

Dimple Kumari Vs State of Rajasthan — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 6073/2019

¶3

Dimple Kumari D/o. Babulal W/o. Sanjay Kumar, Aged about 22 years, R/o. Mathwali Gali, Sanderao, Tehsil Sumerpur, District Pali.

¶4

Sanjay Kumar S/o. Magraj Ji, aged about 30 years, B/c Suthar, R/o. Pithaniawas, Shivganj, District Pali.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Rajasthan

¶8

The Superintendent of Police, Pali.

¶9

The SHO P.S. Sanderao, District Pali.

¶10

Babulal S/o. Sh. Chunnilal, R/o. Mathwali Gali, Sanderao, Tehsil Sumerpur, District Pali.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hitendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶14

Order

¶15

08/11/2019

¶16

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground that the petitioners who being major are living in the company of each other but the company of the petitioners is not palatable to the respondent No.4 & relatives of the petitioner No.1 and they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at their hands.

¶17

[CRLMP-6073/2019]

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on an overall consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that nobody can be permitted to take law in his own hands merely because the petitioners being major are living in the company of each other. Thus, this Court deems it proper to direct the petitioners to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Pali who shall hear the grievance of the petitioners and take appropriate steps for safety and security of the petitioners as they are apprehending untoward incident at the hands of family members of the petitioner No.1.

¶20

Consequently, the present misc. petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the Superintendent of Police, Pali to take appropriate steps for safety and security of the petitioners at the hands of those, who are opposed to their relationship.

¶21

It is made clear that this order is not a proof of age of the petitioners and any observations in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners at the instances of their relatives.

¶22

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR), J.

¶23

S-3-SunilS/-

Dimple Kumari v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dimple Kumari v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Kumar Vs State

Shankarlal Pargi Vs State

Pawan Kumar Vs State

Smt Asha Vs State

Sonali Sharma Vs State

Sarla Kumari Vs State of Rajasthan