Disposed

Aditi Dhaundiyal D/O Shri Suresh Dhundiyal by Caste Brahmin v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Sept 2019CRLMP/5586/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bench dismissed a miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court directed petitioners to approach the Superintendent of Police, Kota, for grievance redressal and protection, disposing of the stay petition accordingly. (Secondary Source, 2019)

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to appear before Superintendent of Police, Kota, for grievance hearing and protection; main and stay petitions disposed.

Aditi Dhaundiyal D/O Shri Suresh… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5586/2019

¶3

Aditi Dhaundiyal D/o Shri Suresh Dhundiyal By Caste Brahmin, Aged About 22 Years, Currently Residing Of Plot No. 53, Gobriya Bawadi, Ward No. 27, Anantpura @ Phoota Talab, Kota, District Kota (Raj.) Permanent Resident Of Plot No. 153, Block No. 13, Dakshinpuri, Dr, Amedkar Nagar, Pushpa Bhawan, Hauzkhas, South Delhi, New Delhi

¶4

Balram Singor Son Of Shri Rajendra Singor By Caste Harijan, Resident Of Plot No. 53, Gobriya Bawadi, Ward No. 27, Anantpura @ Phoota Talab, Kota, District Kota (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

The Director General Of Police, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶9

The Supritendent Of Police, Kota (Raj.)

¶10

The Station House Officer, Police Station Anantpura, Kota (Raj.)

¶11

Suresh Dhaundiyal Son Of Unknown By Caste Brahmin, Resident Of Plot No. 153, Block No. 13, Dakshinpuri, Dr. Amedkar Nagar, Pushpa Bhawan, Hauz Khas, South Delhi, New Delhi

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. F.R. Meena, P.P.

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶15

Judgment / Order

¶16

09/09/2019

¶17

The petitioners have preferred this misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for protection of Life and Liberty from the private respondents.

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CRLMP-5586/2019]

¶20

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on an overall consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it proper to direct the petitioners to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Kota (Raj.), who shall hear the grievance of the petitioners and if necessitated, provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners.

¶21

Consequently, the present misc. petition stands disposed of. Since, the main petition is disposed of, stay petition also stands

¶22

disposed of.

¶23

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶24

Dheeraj/115

Aditi Dhaundiyal D/O Shri Suresh Dhundiyal by Caste Brahmin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aditi Dhaundiyal D/O Shri Suresh Dhundiyal by Caste Brahmin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anju Kumari D/O Lakshmi Narayan Kuldeep, W/O Jitendra Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Manubala and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Anisha and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Ray Singh Son of Govind Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra S/O Bachraj B/C Dhobi Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahesh Kumar Jangid S/O Shri Murlidhar Jangid, B/C Jangid Vs State of Rajasthan