This order addressed a petition for quashing FIRs alleging misuse of office as Sarpanch. The court dismissed the quashing application but granted 15-day notice protection from arrest contingent on joining the investigation.
Petitioner granted 15-day notice protection from arrest upon joining investigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 36/2019
Anita Chaudhary
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Anr.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. VS Rajpurohit, PP
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
21/01/2019
[CRLMP-36/2019]
(2 of 3)
76/2018 and 118/2018 have been filed at Police Station Salaser, District Churu.
[CRLMP-36/2019]
(3 of 3)
petitioner submits a representation along with all the necessary documents before it within a period of ten days from today, then the same shall be considered and decided before completing the investigation, strictly in accordance with law and as per the assurance given by the learned Public Prosecutor.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
106-Sudheer/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the FIRs against the petitioner as a former Sarpanch should be quashed or if prosecution should proceed with protection from arrest.
Whether the petitioner is guilty of offences under Sections 420, 409, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anita Chaudhary
State Of Rajasthan
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
