Disposed

Rinki Kumari @ Rinku Kumari v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Jan 2019CRLMP/269/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking security for petitioners facing threats due to their marriage. The court directs petitioners to appear before the local police to report grievances and assesses whether to pass further orders based on threat perception, clarifying the order does not serve as proof of age. The petition is disposed of with instructions to the SH

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioners to appear before the SHO to analyze threat perceptions; issued directions for vigilance to ensure no harm is caused to the pet

Rinki Kumari @ Rinku Kumari Vs State of Rajasthan — Matrimonial and Divorce | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 269/2019

¶3

Rinki Kumari @ Rinku Kumari W/o Shri Amritlal D/o Shri Thanaram, Aged About 18 Years, By Caste Prajapat, Resident Of Bagra, Tehsil And District Jalore At Present Residing At Dudsi, Tehsil And District Jalore.

¶4

Amritlal S/o Shri Puraram Prajapat, Aged About 18 Years, By Caste Prajapat, Resident Of Dudsi, Tehsil And District Jalore.

¶5

----Petitioners Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan

¶7

Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶8

Station House Officer, Police Station Bagra, District Jalore.

¶9

Shri Thanaram Prajapat, By Caste Prajapat, Resident Of Bagra, Police Station Bagra, Tehsil And District Jalore.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Vijay Purohit. For Respondent(s) : Mr.VS Rajpurohit, PP.

¶12

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶13

Order

¶14

19/01/2019

¶15

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground that they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of the respondent no.4, in view of solemnization of their marriage with each other on 26.12.2018.

¶16

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on

¶17

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-269/2019]

¶18

an overall consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that nobody can be permitted to take law in his own hands merely because marriage is not acceptable. Thus, this Court deems it proper to direct the petitioners to appear before the S.H.O. P.S. Bagra, District Jalore, who shall hear the grievance of the petitioners and after analysing the threat perceptions, if required so, may pass necessary orders.

¶19

Consequently, the present misc. petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the S.H.O. P.S. Bagra, District Jalore to ensure necessary vigil that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of those, who are opposed to the marriage.

¶20

It is made clear that this order is not a proof of age and the marriage of the petitioners and any observations in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners at the instances of their relatives.

¶21

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J.

¶22

32-SPhophaliya/-

Rinki Kumari @ Rinku Kumari v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rinki Kumari @ Rinku Kumari v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sham Ji Bhai Vs State

Raghuveer Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Bheru Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Kishore Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Champa Devi Vs State of Rajasthan

Au Small Finance Bank Vs State