Criminal Misc. Petition for quashing of FIR and discharge of accused. High Court allowed the petition based on a compromise between petitioner/complainant and accused petitioners, invoking inherent powers.
Present misc. petition allowed; petitioner Nos. 2 to 5 discharged of offences under Sections 427, 467, 468 & 471 of IPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2904/2019
| Versus | ----Petitioners | |
|---|---|---|
| State Of Rajasthan | ||
| ----Respondent | ||
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Shreekant Verma |
|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
06/11/2019
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-2904/2019]
M.P. V/s Laxmi Narayan & Ors. [AIR 2019 SC 1296].
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
25-SunilS/-
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can invoke its inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings upon a compromise between the parties.
Whether the petitioners should be discharged of the charges under Sections 427, 467, 468 & 471 of IPC given the settlement.
What was the proper course of action in view of the compromise between the complainant and the accused.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of M.P. vs Laxmi Narayan & Ors.Applied¶15
State of M.P. V/s Laxmi Narayan & Ors. [AIR 2019 SC 1296] · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Praveen Kumar
Usha Garg
Vipin @ Banti
Vikash
Maanmal
State Of Rajasthan
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
