Allowed

Ruparam v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Nov 2019CRLMB/10121/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur allowed the petitioner's second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a narcotics case, noting that an identical case involving another co-accused had already been granted bail. Bail was granted on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the trial court.

Ruparam Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. 2^nd Bail Application No. 10121/2018

¶3

Ruparam S/o Lalaram, Aged About 45 Years, B/c Vishnoi, R/o Rohicha Kla, P.S. Luni, Distt. Jodhpur (Raj)

----Petitioner

Versus

State of Rajasthan

	----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Nishant Bora
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Mukhtyar Khan, P.P.

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶9

Order

¶10

06/11/2019

¶11

The present second bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with FIR No. 152/2017, Police Station Rani, District Pali for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15, 8/18 & 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

¶13

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that after dismissal of the first bail application of the petitioner on 26.07.2018, the co-accused Sohanlal has been granted bail by this Court vide Order dated 01.08.2019. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from the case of the co-accused Sohanlal who has already been released on bail by this Court.

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-10121/2018]

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application but he is unable to distinguish the case of the present petitioner vis-a-vis the case of the co-accused Sohanlal who has been enlarged on bail.

¶17

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced and considering the fact that the case of the present petitioner is identical to coaccused Sohanlal, who has been enlarged on bail by this Court, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is also entitled for the grant of bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.

¶18

Consequently, the second bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Ruparam s/o Lalaram arrested in connection with FIR No. 152/2017, Police Station Rani, District Pali shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR), J.

¶20

11-Inder/-

Ruparam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ruparam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Sureya Bano Vs State

Tulsi Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Anita Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramesh Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Gautam Vs State