Petitioner sought fair investigation via a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition. The High Court, citing Supreme Court precedents affirming Magistrate jurisdiction, refused to entertain the petition, directing the petitioner to approach the Magistrate instead.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2772/2017
Rohitash S/o Shri Maktul Singh B/c Khati, R/o Badbar, Tehsil Buhana, Distt. Jhunjhunu Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None Present For State : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
08/07/2019
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-2772/2017]
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Amit/48
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking fair investigation should be entertained despite Apex Court directives regarding the Magistrate's jurisdiction.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sakiri Vasu vs. State of U.P. & Ors.Referred¶17
AIR 2008 SC Page 907 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rohitash
State Of Rajasthan Through Pp
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
