The High Court dismissed a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking fair investigation and cautioned against filing writs for investigation grievances, directing the petitioner to approach the Magistrate.
Petition dismissed; stay application disposed; petitioner free to approach the Magistrate for inquiry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 176/2018
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None Present For State : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
08/07/2019
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-176/2018]
Section 482 Cr.P.C. simply because a person has a grievance that investigation has not been done properly by the Police. For this grievance, the remedy lies before the Magistrate concerned.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Amit Kumar/51
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking fair investigation when the remedy lies before the Magistrate.
Whether a writ petition should be filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. simply because of a grievance regarding improper police investigation.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sakiri Vasu vs. State of U.P. & Ors.Referred¶18
AIR 2008 SC Page 907 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanwariya S/o Jugraj
Mahesh Nama S/o Ramesh Chand Chhipa
State Of Rajasthan
Director General Of Police, Rajasthan
Superintendent Of Police, Bundi
Station Head Officer, Police Station Keshorai Patan
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
