Disposed

Priyanka v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 Jan 2019CRLMP/235/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought directions for security against threats arising from marital opposition. The Court relied on Section 482 CrPC to direct the SHO to investigate threat perceptions and ensure vigilance without declaring the order proof of age.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to the SHO of Nohar Police Station to ensure necessary vigilance and hear the grievance of the petitioners if threats are perceived.

Priyanka Vs State of Rajasthan — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶2

JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 235/2019

¶4

Priyanka Spouse/o Sonu, Aged About 22 Years, D/o Rambhagat Hanumangarh.

¶5

Sonu S/o Ugrasen, Aged About 27 Years, Both B/c Jat, R/o W.no.13, Nearby Sariya Dharamshala, Parlika Nohar, Dist Hanumangarh.

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Dept Of Home Affairs, Govt Of Raj, Jaipur.

¶9

Supdt Of Police, Hanumangarh.

¶10

Supdt Of Police, Bhiwani (Haryana)

¶11

Sho, Nohar Ps, Dist Hanumangarh.

¶12

Sho, Tosam Ps, Dist Bhiwani (Haryana).

¶13

Babita Spouse/o Rambhagat, Bhiwani (Haryana).

¶14

Virendra S/o Rambhagat, Bhiwani (Haryana).

¶15

Suresh S/o Shishpal, No. 6 To 8 B/c Jat, R/o Chappar Jogian, Teh Tosam, Dist Bhiwani (Haryana).

¶16

----Respondents

¶17

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Halu For Respondent(s) : Mr. VS Rajpurohit, PP

¶18

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI Order

¶19

15/01/2019

¶20

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground that they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of respondent

¶21

(2 of 2)

¶22

[CRLMP-235/2019]

¶23

No.4 & their relatives, in view of solemnization of their marriage with each other on 10.01.2019

¶24

After hearing the petitioners present in person and on an overall consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that nobody can be permitted to take law in his own hands merely because marriage is not acceptable. Thus, this Court deems it proper to direct the petitioners to appear before the SHO of Nohar Police Station, District Hanumangarh, who shall hear the grievance of the petitioners and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if required so, may pass necessary orders.

¶25

Consequently, the present misc. petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the SHO of Nohar Police Station, District Hanumangarh to ensure necessary vigil that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of those, who are opposed to the marriage.

¶26

It is made clear that this order is not a proof of age and the marriage of the petitioners and any observations in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners at the instances of their relatives.

¶27

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J

¶28

111-Sudheer/-

Priyanka v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Priyanka v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradhana Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra Kaur Vs State of Rajasthan

Aamin Khan Vs State

Gopiram Agarwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Raju Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Rewat Dan Vs State of Rajasthan