Allowed

Prithvi Raj Meena S/O Shri Ram Karan Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Apr 2019CRLMP/2276/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking direction for prompt investigation. Upon the Public Prosecutor's assurance of expeditious investigation within two months, the order was allowed and remanded to the officials for compliance.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to conduct investigation by a gazetted sensitised officer and submit report within two months.

Prithvi Raj Meena S/O Shri Ram Karan Meena… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2276/2019

¶3

Prithvi Raj Meena S/o Shri Ram Karan Meena, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Lahsodia, Ps Aligarh, District Tonk, Raj.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan, Through PP.

¶7

SHO Police Station Aligarh, District Tonk, Raj.

¶8

Investigation Officer In FIR No.55/2018, Police Station Aligarh, District Tonk, Raj.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Sharma PP

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA

¶12

Order

¶13

05/04/2019

¶14

This Miscellaneous Petition has been preferred under section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that a direction be issued to the respondents for conducting prompt objective, impartial and expeditious investigation in an FIR No.55/2018 registered at Police Station, Aligarh, Tonk, for the offence under sections 279 and 337 IPC.

¶15

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Sharma, counsel for the petitioner has stated at Bar that till today, investigation is still pending and that no status report of the investigation has been filed before any of the Court so far.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State, at the inception, to dispel the apprehension of the petitioner, has rendered an assurance that not only fair and expeditious

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMP-2276/2019]

¶19

investigation shall be conducted by a gazetted sensitised police officer, but also the report qua the same along with the opinion of the Investigating Officer shall be submitted in the concerned Court within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order by the Investigating Officer.

¶20

Upon the above mentioned assurance, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the present petition be disposed of in the light of the statement made by the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶21

Ordered accordingly.

¶22

A copy of this order under the seal and signature of the Court Master be given ‘dasti’ to the learned Public Prosecutor for forwarding the same to the concerned officials and for necessary compliance.

¶23

(PRAKASH GUPTA),J

¶24

OM 81

Prithvi Raj Meena S/O Shri Ram Karan Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prithvi Raj Meena S/O Shri Ram Karan Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uma Devi W/O Late Shri Bheelaram Puniya Vs State of Rajasthan

Pragati Choudhary, D/O- Shri Dhura Ram Jakhar, W/O- Shri Raj Kumar Choudhary Vs State of Rajasthan

Sheela Nawariya Daughter of Shri Ramavtar Nawariya Vs State of Rajasthan

Murari Lal S/O Sh. Madan Lal Gupta B/C Mahajan Vs State of Rajasthan

Raju @ Rajesh S/O Shri Rameshwar Lal B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Lokesh Saini S/O Shri Chhuttan Lal Saini B/C Mali Vs State of Rajasthan