Disposed

Karishma Kumari Gochar D/O Shri Ramdev v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC24 Apr 2019CRLMP/1923/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by a newly married couple. The court directed police officers to ensure the safety of the petitioners from those opposing their marriage. The court clarified that this direction does not determine the marriage's validity.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the concerned Station House Officer to ensure that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners by those opposing the marriage.

Karishma Kumari Gochar D/O Shri Ramdev Vs State of… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1923/2019

¶3

Karishma Kumari Gochar D/o Shri Ramdev, R/o Khyawada, Bundi, Rajasthan, Presently R/o Jhargaon Kota, Raj.

¶4

Sonu Kumar S/o Shri Rampal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Jhargaon, Kota, Raj.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.

¶8

Superintendent Of Police, Bundi, Rajasthan.

¶9

Station House Officer, Police Station Aayana, District Kota.

¶10

Station House Officer, Police Station Gendoli, District Bundi.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ranjeet Singh Gaur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Sharma, PP

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA

¶14

Judgment / Order

¶15

24/04/2019

¶16

The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioners whereby it is prayed that necessary direction be issued to the respondents No.2 to 4 to protect the petitioners as they apprehend danger to their life and liberty at the hands of those who are against the marriage.

¶17

The newly married couple is present in person. They have been identified by their counsel Mr. Ranjeet Singh Gaur, Advocate.

¶18

It is stated by Smt. Karishma Kumari, petitioner No.1, who is present in person, that she is eighteen years old. It is also

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CRLMP-1923/2019]

¶21

submitted by her that she had performed marriage with petitioner No.2 Sonu Kumar according to her own free-will and accord and is living happily with him as a wife.

¶22

Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties and going through the averments made in the petition, this Court is of the view that nobody can be permitted to take law in his own hands merely because marriage is not acceptable.

¶23

In the result, the present petition stands disposed of, by issuing direction to the concerned Station House Officer to ensure necessary observance that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of those, who are opposed to the marriage.

¶24

It is made clear that this order has been passed without determining the age and validity of the marriage of petitioners on the ground that those, who are opposed to the marriage, cannot cause harm to anybody.

¶25

(PRAKASH GUPTA),J

¶26

Mohit Rohila /53

Karishma Kumari Gochar D/O Shri Ramdev v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karishma Kumari Gochar D/O Shri Ramdev v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Kareem Vs Mohammad Yasin

Vishal Car Decor Vs Arushi Car Decor

Rampat S/O Shri Dhansiram B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Chandra Bhan Jatav Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Renu Singh W/O Ranjit Singh B/C Punjabi Vs State of Rajasthan

Anju Ramesh Jaldhari W/O Amit Kumar Sharma, D/O Ramesh Jaldhari Vs State of Rajasthan