This order rejects an anticipatory bail application that was not pressed by the petitioner. The court grants liberty to the petitioner to surrender if needed.
Liberty granted to the petitioner to surrender.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9207/2019
Bhanwara Ram S/o Hanumana Ram, Aged About 21 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Village Ratau, Tehsil Ladnu, District Nagaur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.R. Choudhary, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
02/08/2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this anticipatory bail application preferred by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C., however, seeks liberty for the petitioner to surrender.
Accordingly, the application preferred by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is rejected as not pressed with the liberty sought for.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
103-Babulal/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhanwara Ram S/o Hanumana Ram
State Of Rajasthan
VIJAY BISHNOI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
