Allowed

Gappu Partidar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Aug 2019CRLMB/9173/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner accused of offences under Sections 8/20 of the NDPS Act. The contention that the seized contraband ganza (5 kgs) was below commercial quantity was noted. Bail was granted subject to execution of a personal bond with solvable sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Gappu Partidar Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9173/2019

¶3

Gappu Patidar S/o Sh. Ranchod, Aged About 61 Years, B/c Patidar, R/o 127, Narayanpura, P.s. Mengaon, Dist. Khargon. (M.p.). (At Present Lodged At Central Jail, Bhilwara)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Bhati For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

¶10

Judgment / Order

¶11

05/08/2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record.

¶13

The petitioner(s) has/have been arrested in FIR No.88/2019 of Police Station Mangrop, Distt. Bhilwara for the offences punishable under Sections 8/20 of the NDPS Act. He/she/they has/have preferred this/these bail application(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in this matter, narcotic contraband ganza weiging 5 kgs alleged to have been recovered from the petitioner is below commercial quantity.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application(s).

¶16

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-9173/2019]

¶19

case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶20

Accordingly, this/these bail application(s) filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is/are allowed and it is directed that petitioner(s) – Gappu Patidar S/o Sh. Ranchod shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.88/2019 of Police Station Mangrop, Distt. Bhilwara provided he/she/they execute(s) a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his/her/their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶21

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

¶22

71-msrathore/-

Gappu Partidar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gappu Partidar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhanwara Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Oma Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajesh Verma Vs State of Rajasthan

Rohit @ Hemant Gurjar Vs State

Prince Soni Vs State

Jagdish @ Jagga Vs State