Anticipatory bail application not pressed by petitioner was dismissed. The application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was disposed of on merit without argument.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8125/2019
Kojaram S/o Ashuram, Aged About 40 Years, B/c Meghwal, R/o Village Bhinjharwali Tehsil Loonkaransar, District Bikaner (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kaushal Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.R. Choudhary, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
30/07/2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the bail application.
Accordingly, the bail application preferred by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
75-Taruna/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kojaram S/o Ashuram
State Of Rajasthan
VIJAY BISHNOI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
