The High Court of Rajasthan, Jodhpur denied anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The single-judge bench found no grounds for granting relief and dismissed the application filed under section 438 Cr.P.C.
The instant bail application filed under section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 8018/2018
Bannalal S/o Sh. Mohanlal Bhambi, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Gathila Kheda, P.s. Sadar, District Bhilwara
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avinash Bhati For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.S. Rathore, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
02/01/2019
Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor and after perusing the case diary, this Court does not find any ground to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Hence, the instant bail application filed under section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
8-Taruna/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bannalal S/o Sh. Mohanlal Bhambi
State Of Rajasthan
Vijay Bishnoi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
