Ramu Ram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to multiple petitioners accused in an FIR regarding bigamous marriage and cheating offences, directing them to furnish a bond and adhere to specific conditions.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail granted on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each, subject to conditions of interrogation, no inducement, and no leaving India.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7042/2019
Ganpat S/o Gabruram, Aged About 35 Years, By Caste Suthar, Resident Of Uparla Bass, Village Bhawi, Tehsil Bilara, District Jodhpur
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
CONNECTED WITH
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7044/2019
- Ramu Ram S/o Shri Gudra Ram, Aged About 25 Years,
- Gudra Ram S/o Shri Surja Ram, Aged About 58 Years,
- Smt. Leela Devi W/o Gudar Ram, Aged About 58 Years, All By Caste Suthar, R/o Uparla Bass, Village Bhavi, Tehsil Bilara, District Jodhpur
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to petitioners accused under Sections 494, 420, 193 and 120-B IPC in FIR No.58/2019.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ganpat S/o Gabruram and others
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Vijay Bishnoi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/7044/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court