Aftab @ Sohel v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur granted bail to the accused without expressing opinion on merits, directing release on personal bond with sureties.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on bail with a personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each each.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 58/2019
Aftab @ Sohel S/o Lakku @ Sabir, Aged About 28 Years, B/c Bhisti Musalman, R/o Behind Government School, Udaimandir Aasan, Police Thana Nagauri Gate, Jodhpur. (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Latif For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Avasthi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
09/01/2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.
The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.466/2018 of Police Station Udaimandir, District Jodhpur, for the offences punishable under Sections 436 and 327 IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.466/2018.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Aftab @ Sohel S/o Lakku @ Sabir
- respondent
State
Coram
VIJAY BISHNOI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/58/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court