Allowed

Vikram @ Vicky v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Jan 2019CRLMB/66/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, arrested for possessing drugs punishable under Sections 8 and 21 NDPS Act, filed bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The High Court granted bail after perusing the material on record without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each to appear before trial court.

Vikram @ Vicky Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 66/2019

¶3

Vikram @ Vicky S/o Hansraj, Aged About 20 Years, Kalibanga P.t. Distt. Hanumangarh (Lodged In Distt. Jail Hanumangarh)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Ojha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashok Upadhayay, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

¶10

Judgment / Order

¶11

08/01/2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

¶13

The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.599/2018 of Police Station Pilibanga, District Hanumangarh for the offences punishable under Sections 8/21, 22 NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per the prosecution story, Parvonrin Spas Capsules, containing tramadol weighing 241.3 gms have been recovered from the petitioner, whereas commercial quantity of tramadol as prescribed is more than 250 gms.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-66/2019]

¶19

case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶20

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Vikram @ Vicky S/o Hansraj, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.599/2018 of Police Station Pilibanga, District Hanumangarh provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶21

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

¶22

SURABHII/37

Vikram @ Vicky v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikram @ Vicky v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dayal Ram Vs State

Manish Kumar Prasad Vs State

Padam Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijay Paswan @ Chandan @ Jija Vs State

Surendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Fardin Khan Vs State