Allowed

Kasturi Devi W/O Shri Babu Lal Jaat v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Dec 2019CRLMB/16127/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This anticipatory bail application was allowed granting bail to three petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The petitioners must furnish a bond and adhere to conditions preventing interference with witnesses or leaving the country without permission.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each subject to conditions of appearing for interrogation, not influencing witnesses, and not leaving India wit

Kasturi Devi W/O Shri Babu Lal Jaat Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR WASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16127/2019

¶3

Kasturi Devi W/o Shri Babu Lal Jaat, R/o Vill. Cheethwadi Thesil Chomu Dist. Jaipur Raj.

¶4

Anita Devi W/o Shri Kanaram Jaat, R/o Vill. Cheethwadi Thesil Chomu Dist. Jaipur Raj.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Sardar singh Choudhary, Aged About 17 Years, ~uvenile Through Natural Gurdian Kidhani Vill.

¶7

State Of Rajasthan,
53 s
F.. 4'' y Lg
For Petitioner(s) :, .-$p&,&ja!; $ $ TI
"1"s MM, 9&
For Respondent(s) .+$%=ME

¶8

These bail applications have been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.310/2019 registered at P.S. Kaladera, Jaipur Rural for the offences mentioned therein against the applicants, whereupon the investigation was commenced. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners moved the bail

¶9

(2 of 3)

¶10

[CRLMB-16127/2019]

¶11

applications before the court below, which were dismissed. Hence, these bail applications have been filed.

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available on record.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that conlplainant and There is no specific role in

¶14

On the other hand . leazned Public Prosecutor opposed d the bail applications.

¶15

k. Eissions advanced by the learned counsel fo ;the allegations levelled against the applicant Ing to the facts and circumstances of the cas xpressing any opinion on the merits and deme it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail

¶16

ns filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C are allowed t in the event of arrest of petitioners Kastesri Dewi W/O Shri Babw Lal Jaat, Anita Dewi W/O Shri Kanaram Jaat and Sardar Singh Chsesdhary in the aforesaid FIR, they shall be released on bail by the concerned SHO/Investigating Officer, provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,0001- each to the satisfaction of the SHOIIO of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:

¶17

i) That the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation before the police officer, as and when required;

¶18

ii) That the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;

¶19

iii) That the petitioners shall not leave India without prior permission of the court;

Kasturi Devi W/O Shri Babu Lal Jaat v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kasturi Devi W/O Shri Babu Lal Jaat v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abbas S/O Shri Samsu Vs State of Rajasthan

Munni W/O Mahendra B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonu S/O Shri Brijender Singh B/C Mali Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajveer S/O Shri Guljhari Lal B/C Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Rai Singh S/O Amar Singh B/C Tanwar Vs State of Rajasthan

Sherkhan S/O Aameen B/C Musalman Vs State of Rajasthan