Allowed

Jagram @ Jagga S/O Rajjam v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Oct 2019CRLMB/14860/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed this bail application. It observed that the case arose from a tractor-jeep accident where the petitioners were not deemed necessary for further investigation, leading to a decision for bail with bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on condition of furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Jagram @ Jagga S/O Rajjam Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14860/2019

¶3

Jagram @ Jagga S/o Rajjam, Aged About 25 Years, B/c Gurjar, R/o Samoochi, Police Station Kherli, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail Alwar)

¶4

Suresh S/o Roopram, Aged About 35 Years, B/c Meena, R/o Rampura, Police Station Kherli, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail Alwar)

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhawani Shankar Sharma, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶11

Order

¶12

23/10/2019

¶13

Petitioners have filed this bail application under Section

¶14

439 of Cr.P.C.

¶15

F.I.R. No. 279/2019 was registered at Police Station Kherli District Alwar for offence under Sections 332, 353 of I.P.C. and Section 3 P.D.P.P. Act.

¶16

It is contended by counsel for the petitioners that an accident took place between tractor and Government jeep on which a case has been registered. Petitioners are not required for further investigation.

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶18

I have considered the contentions.

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CRLMB-14860/2019]

¶21

Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioners, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

¶22

This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/(Rupees One Lac Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶24

MADAN MEENA /374/230

Jagram @ Jagga S/O Rajjam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagram @ Jagga S/O Rajjam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Juharu S/O Chander Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra Prasad @ Rajan S/O Shri Bhagelu Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt Kailashi Devi W/O Shri Sharwan Lal Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Govind S/O Subesingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Suman Devi Bairwa W/O Vishram Bairwa Vs State of Rajasthan

Ram Singh S/O Ghasiram B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan