The High Court dismissed a petition seeking quashing of an FIR alleging forcing of marriage and suicide threats, holding that the FIR disclosed a cognizable offence requiring investigation per Apex Court guidelines.
Petition for quashing of F.I.R. No.775/2019 is dismissed. Stay application is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Versus
----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Saransh Ghiya For State : Mr. C.G. Chopra, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
22/10/2019
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-4996/2019]
& Ors. (supra), I am not inclined to entertain the Petition seeking quashing of F.I.R.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Amit Kumar/114
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can quash the FIR alleging forcing of marriage and suicide threats before the investigation is complete.
Whether the FIR discloses prima facie commission of a cognizable offence preventing immediate quashing under Apex Court guidelines.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dineshbhai Chandubhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat & Ors.Referred¶21
Dineshbhai Chandubhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat & Ors. 2018(3) SCC Page 106 · Who else cites this
Dineshbhai Chandubhai Patel vs. State of GujaratReferred¶22
Dineshbhai Chandubhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat & Ors.
Rajendra Prasad @ Rajan S/o Shri Bhagelu Prasad, Aged About 25 Years
Bhagelu Prasad S/o Bharat Prasad, Aged About 62 Years
Kapil Prasad S/o Shri Bhagelu Prasad
Mohan Kumar Paswan S/o Shri Bhagelu Prasad, Aged About 30 Years
Rekha Kumari D/o Shri Bhagelu Prasad, Aged About 21 Years
State Of Rajasthan
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
