Allowed

Arun Bhati v. State

Rajasthan HC22 Nov 2019CRLMB/14289/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur allowed an application for correction in the name of the petitioner and then granted bail to the accused under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with an offence under Sections 450, 366, 354, and 354A IPC.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each, conditional upon appearance before the trial court.

Arun Bhati Vs State — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14289/2019

¶3

Arjun Bhati S/o Shri Kishan Bhati, Aged About 26 Years, By Caste Oad, R/o 166, Vijay Singh Pathik Nagar, Kachhi Basti, Saleem Wali Gali, Sector No. 9, Savina, Udaipur. (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Udaipur)

----Petitioner

Versus

State, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Shah For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶10

Judgment / Order

¶11

22/11/2019

¶12

The matter comes up on an application for correction in the name of the petitioner.

¶13

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Amended cause title filed with the application is hereby taken on record.

¶14

Heard on the bail application.

¶15

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.402/2019 of Police Station Hiran Magri, District Udaipur for the offence punishable under Sections 450, 366, 354, 354A IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶16

Counsel for the petitioner submits that charge-sheet has already been filed by the Police. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-14289/2019]

¶19

time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶21

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶22

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Arjun Bhati S/o Shri Kishan Bhati shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.402/2019 of Police Station Hiran Magri, District Udaipur provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶23

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶24

136-MS/-

Arun Bhati v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arun Bhati v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Ayub Vs State

Harvindra Singh Vs State

Rajesh Vs State

Roopa Ram Vs State

Ramu Devi Vs State of Rajasthan

Suresh Chandra Vs State of Rajasthan