Allowed

Gajendra Vyas S/O Ramavtar Vyas B/C Brahmin v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC26 Nov 2019CRLMB/12553/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Rajasthan allowed an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Grant conditioned on the furnishing of a personal bond and two sureties, along with specific undertakings to cooperate with investigation and not abscond.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/ and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/ each with specific undertakings.

Gajendra Vyas S/O Ramavtar Vyas B/C Brahmin Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2019) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12553/2019

¶3

Gajendra Vyas S/o Ramavtar Vyas, Aged About 48 years, B/c Brahmin , R/o Gali No.3 Near Shiv Mandir Rangpur Road, Kota Junction, Kota Through Sanchalak Rajasthan Upper Primary School, Rajeev Nagar, Kacchi Basti, Ganesh Nagar, PS Railway Colony, Kota (Raj).

¶4

----Accused-Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, P.P.

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR

¶10

Order

¶11

26/11/2019

¶12

This bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.17/2019 registered at P.S. Railway Colony Distt. Kota City for the offences mentioned therein against the applicant, whereupon the investigation was commenced. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner moved the bail application before the court below, which was dismissed. Hence, this bail application has been filed.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available on record.

¶14

(2 of 3)

¶15

[CRLMB-12553/2019]

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per direction of this Court, applicant has joined investigation. Custodial interrogation of the applicant is not required.

¶17

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶18

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for applicant, note of the allegations levelled against the applicant as also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant.

¶19

Therefore, this bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Gajendra Vyas S/o Ramavtar Vyas in the aforesaid FIR, he shall be released on bail by the concerned SHO/Investigating Officer, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the SHO/IO of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:

¶20

i) That the petitioner/s shall make himself/herself/themselves available for interrogation before the police officer, as and when required;

¶21

ii) That the petitioner/s shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;

¶22

iii) That the petitioner/s shall not leave India without previous permission of the court;

¶23

(3 of 3)

¶24

[CRLMB-12553/2019]

¶25

iv) That the petitioner/s shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she/they is/are accused or suspected.

¶26

(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR),J

¶27

Dheeraj /2

Gajendra Vyas S/O Ramavtar Vyas B/C Brahmin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gajendra Vyas S/O Ramavtar Vyas B/C Brahmin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Rai Sharma S/O Shri U.S. Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

B P@Vinod S/O Natholi Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonukumar S/O Shital Prasad B/C Brahmin Vs State of Rajasthan

Bimla Devi W/O Gangaram B/C Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhagat Singh S/O Somveer B/C Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Paan Devi W/O Madan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan