Allowed

Deepak Rai Sharma S/O Shri U.S. Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 Nov 2019CRLMB/11953/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to an applicant facing criminal charges under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court imposed conditions including appearance for interrogation, no inducement, no leaving India without permission, and not committing similar offenses, requiring a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each; conditions imposed.

Deepak Rai Sharma S/O Shri U.S. Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11953/2019

¶3

Deepak Rai Sharma S/o Shri U.S. Sharma, B/c Brahamin R/o Opposite M.C. Donald, Bodarpur Flyover, Pillar No.69 N.H.2, Faridabad (Haryana). At Present Director Readyimaze Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Faridabad (Haryana).

¶4

----Accused-Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, P.P. For Complainant(s) : Mr. Amit Singh Shekhawat

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR

¶10

Order

¶11

25/11/2019

¶12

This bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.29/2019 registered at P.S. Kotwali Sikar Distt. Sikar for the offences mentioned therein against the petitioner, whereupon the investigation was commenced. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner moved the bail application before the court below, which was dismissed. Hence, this bail application has been filed.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor perused the material made available on record.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the criminal case whereas, dispute is of civil nature. It is not in dispute that C.T. Scan machine was installed at the place of complainant.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-11953/2019]

¶17

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application.

¶18

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for applicant, note of the allegations levelled against the applicant as also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant.

¶19

Therefore, this bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Deepak Rai Sharma S/o Shri U.S. Sharma in the aforesaid FIR, he shall be released on bail by the concerned SHO/Investigating Officer, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the SHO/IO of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:

¶20

i) That the petitioner/s shall make himself/herself/themselves available for interrogation before the police officer, as and when required;

¶21

ii) That the petitioner/s shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;

¶22

iii) That the petitioner/s shall not leave India without previous permission of the court;

¶23

iv) That the petitioner/s shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she/they is/are accused or suspected.

¶24

(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR),J

¶25

Dheeraj/2

Deepak Rai Sharma S/O Shri U.S. Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Rai Sharma S/O Shri U.S. Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rama W/O Laxman B/C Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Rasaal W/O Shri Ramnarain Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunita W/O Shri Dharmveer Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

B P@Vinod S/O Natholi Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonukumar S/O Shital Prasad B/C Brahmin Vs State of Rajasthan

Seema Jangid W/O Vinod Jangid B/C Jangid Vs State of Rajasthan