Allowed

Raju Kumar @ Raju v. State

Rajasthan HC10 Jan 2019CRLMB/123/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Vijay Bishnoi, in a bail petition regarding Sections 8/15, 29 NDPS Act, granted bail to the accused who was involved in a case with 26 kg poppy husk below commercial quantity, directing execution of a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail in connection with FIR No. 216/2018 provided the petitioner executes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Raju Kumar @ Raju Vs State — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 123/2019

¶3

Raju Kumar @ Raju S/o Madanlal, Aged About 32 Years, By Caste Dhanak, Resident Of Pasdampur, Tehsil Padampur, Dist. Sriganganagar. (Presently Lodged At Sub-Jail, Srikaranpur, District Sriganganagar)

Versus

State, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr Pankaj Kumar Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr Pankaj Avasthi

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

¶9

Order

¶10

10/01/2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

¶12

The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.216/2018 of Police Station Srikaranpur, District Sri Ganganagar for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15, 29 of NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that 26 kilograms Poppy Husk was recovered from the petitioner in the matter, which is below commercial quantity.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-123/2019]

¶18

case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner – Raj Kumar alias Raju son of Madan Lal shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.216/2018 of Police Station Srikaranpur, District Sri Ganganagar provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶20

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

¶21

23-MMA/-

Raju Kumar @ Raju v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Kumar @ Raju v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Paramjeet Kaur @ Ranjeet Kaur Vs State

Aftab @ Sohel Vs State

Ram Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Hurta Vs State of Rajasthan

Nitesh Vs State

Ruparam Vs State of Rajasthan