Allowed

Sonu Meena S/O Shri Banwari Lal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC26 Sept 2019CRLMB/12100/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court of Rajasthan enlarged the petitioner, Sonu Meena, on bail provided he furnished a personal bond and two sureties, deeming it just and proper despite opposition by the Public Prosecutor.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was enlarged on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/ - and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/ - each.

Sonu Meena S/O Shri Banwari Lal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12100/2019

¶3

Sonu Meena S/o Shri Banwari Lal Meena, B/c Meena R/o Bhagsara Ps Fatehpur Sadar Dist. Sikar Raj. (At Present Confined In Dist. Jail Sikar)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Poonia. Mr. Anil Kumar. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Ola, P.P.

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

¶9

Order

¶10

26/09/2019

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 30/2019 registered at Police Station Udyog Nagar District Sikar for the offence(s) under Sections 341, 323 & 307/34 of IPC and Section 5/27 of Arms Act.

¶12

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that none of the injuries sustained by the injured is dangerous to life. Counsel further submits that the challan has already been presented in this matter and the petitioner is behind the bars since 24.04.2019.

¶13

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶14

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-12100/2019]

¶17

the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶18

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Sonu Meena S/o Shri Banwari Lal Meena shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

¶20

MG/12

Sonu Meena S/O Shri Banwari Lal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu Meena S/O Shri Banwari Lal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Moti Lal through Lrs and Another Vs Smt Sumitra and Another

Ravindrapal Singh @ Rinku S/O Hariom B/C Thakur Vs State of Rajasthan

Shiv Shankar S/O Shri Ramdev B/C Nath Vs State of Rajasthan

Vinod S/O Ramraj Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashok Kumar Sisodiya S/O Shri Balwant Vs State of Rajasthan

Mumtaj Khan S/O Raseed Khan Vs State of Rajasthan