High Court at Jaipur allowed bail to the petitioner Vinod, falsely implicated in an FIR for offences under Sections 323, 393, and 394 IPC, to furnish a personal bond and two sureties.
Petitioner enlarged on bail with a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11784/2019
Vinod S/o Ramraj, B/c Kalal R/o Hingonia Ps Kekadi Dist. Ajmer Raj. (At Present Accused Is Confined In J/c Ajmer)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Pushpendra Sharma for Mr. |
|---|---|
| Narendra Mewara. | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. S.S. Ola,P.P. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
26/09/2019
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-11784/2019]
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
MG/09
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. given the allegations of false implication and triability by Magistrate.
Whether the court should enlarge the petitioner on bail without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vinod S/o Ramraj
State Of Rajasthan
INDERJEET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
