Allowed

Bharatram@Bharat Bairagi S/O Udaa Ji @ Udayram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Sept 2019CRLMB/11911/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan granted bail to the accused-petitioner in his second bail application. The court was satisfied that it was just and proper to enlarge the petitioner, requiring him to furnish a personal bond and personal sureties to appear before the trial court.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner shall be enlarged on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Bharatram@Bharat Bairagi S/O Udaa Ji @ Udayram Vs State… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2^nd Bail Application No. 11911/2019

¶3

Bharatram@bharat Bairagi S/o Udaa Ji @ Udayram, Aged About 40 Years, B/c Bairagi R/o Nai Aabadi Vill. Dhuakhedi Ps Bhanpur Dist. Mandsor (Mp) (At Present Confined In Sub Dist. Jail Bhawani Mandi Dist. Jhalawar Raj.)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Ola, P.P.

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order

¶9

18/09/2019

¶10

The present 2^nd bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 241/2019 registered at Police Station Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Section 8/18 of NDPS Act.

¶11

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that the contraband article recovered from possession of the petitioner is less than the commercial quantity and no other case under the NDPS Act is pending against the petitioner. Counsel further submits that the challan has already been presented in this matter and conclusion of the trial may take long time.

¶12

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶13

(2 of 2)

¶14

[CRLMB-11911/2019]

¶15

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶16

Accordingly, this 2^nd bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Bharatram@bharat Bairagi S/o Udaa Ji @ Udayram shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶17

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

¶18

MG/15

Bharatram@Bharat Bairagi S/O Udaa Ji @ Udayram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bharatram@Bharat Bairagi S/O Udaa Ji @ Udayram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Govind Meena S/O Shri Daulatram B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Bachchan Singh Gurjar @ Phool Singh S/O Ganga Singh B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Parvinder S/O Late Sh. Rakesh Jain B/C Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhura Saini @ Mukesh Kumar Saini S/O Ganguram @ Gangaram Saini B/C Mali Vs State of Rajasthan

Sanno S/O Hiralal Vs State of Rajasthan

Dilip Singh S/O Mangu Singh B/C Sondhya Rajput Vs State of Rajasthan