Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Sanno S/O Hiralal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2019)

Home
Rajasthan HC
2019
Sanno S/O Hiralal Vs State of RajasthanSanno S/O Hiralal v. State of Rajasthan

Allowed

Sanno S/O Hiralal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Sept 2019CRLMB/11877/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed the second bail application of the accused petitioner, Sanno S/o Hiralal, arrested for offences under Sections 323, 341, 336, 326, and 307 IPC, deeming it just and proper to grant bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge.

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner should be enlarged on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. given the facts and circumstances of the case.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The second bail application filed by the accused under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was allowed. The court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, considered the facts and circumstances and deemed it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2^nd Bail Application No. 11877/2019

Sanno S/o Hiralal, R/o Sablgarh Ps Jurhara Dist. Bharatpur (Accused Petitioner Confined In Dist. Jail Bharatpur)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Chand Thakuriya For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Ola, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

Order

18/09/2019

The present second bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 92/2019 Registered at Police Station Jurhara, District Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 323, 341, 336, 326, 307 of I.P.C.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the injuries sustained by the injured-Ramveer are not dangerous to life. Counsel further submits that the challan has already been presented in the court and conclusion of trial may take long time.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-11877/2019]

Accordingly, this second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Sanno S/o Hiralal shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the

dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

JYOTI /14

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the petitioner should be enlarged on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. given the facts and circumstances of the case.

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

CrPC439

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Sanno S/o Hiralal
respondent
State Of Rajasthan

Coram

AI extract

INDERJEET SINGH

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Rajasthan HC
Decided on: 18 Sept 2019 · September
Registered: 30 Aug 2019
Case no.: CRLMB/11877/2019
CNR: RJHC020774342019
Topic: Bail and Remand
Bench: Inderjeet Singh
Disposal: ALLOWED

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Inderjeet Singh

Govind Meena S/O Shri Daulatram B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan
17 Sept 2019
Bachchan Singh Gurjar @ Phool Singh S/O Ganga Singh B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan
17 Sept 2019
Parvinder S/O Late Sh. Rakesh Jain B/C Jain Vs State of Rajasthan
17 Sept 2019
Bhura Saini @ Mukesh Kumar Saini S/O Ganguram @ Gangaram Saini B/C Mali Vs State of Rajasthan
18 Sept 2019
Dilip Singh S/O Mangu Singh B/C Sondhya Rajput Vs State of Rajasthan
18 Sept 2019
Bharatram@Bharat Bairagi S/O Udaa Ji @ Udayram Vs State of Rajasthan
18 Sept 2019

Cite this judgement

Sanno S/O Hiralal v. State of Rajasthan, CRLMB/11877/2019 (RJ), decided on 18 September 2019.

The High Court of Rajasthan publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

CrPC439

View all statutes

Bench / Coram

INDERJEET SINGH

Parties & counsel