In this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the court dismissed the petition accused of NDPS offences, rejecting reliance on procedural gaps without recording the seizure officer's statement.
Bail application dismissed; petitioner free to move fresh bail application after recording of statement of Seizure Officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11800/2019
Mukesh S/o Shri Kanna Ram, B/c Jat R/o Vill. Salva Kalla Dangiawas Ps Dist. Jodhpur (Lodged In Dist. Jail Bara)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhagirath Ray Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Bhadu, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Order
21/10/2019
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-11800/2019]
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Simple Kumawat /06
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused of offences under the NDPS Act.
Whether the lacunas in the prosecution case warrant granting bail at this stage.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mukesh S/o Shri Kanna Ram
State Of Rajasthan
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
