Petitioners seek quashing of FIRs under connected petitions. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the police concluded no offence was made out. Consequently, the court dismissed the petitions as infructuous pending police report.
Petitions for quashing of F.I.R. and fair investigation dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4498/2019
Ved Prakash S/o Shri Raja Ram B/c Bishnoi, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Plot No.1269, Rani Sati Nagar, Nirman Nagar, Jaipur, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 186/2015
Both S/o Rikhabh Raj Jain R/o 4/455 Malviya Nagar Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2656/2017
Sanjay Bhandari S/o Shri Ram Raj Bhandari, R/o G-123, Ramanuj Path, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-4498/2019]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Virender Godara For State : Mr. Arvind Bhadu, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
18/10/2019
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
AMIT KUMAR /161-162-163
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal miscellaneous petitions for quashing of FIR are maintainable when the police has concluded that no offence is made out.
Ved Prakash S/o Shri Raja Ram B/c Bishnoi
Alok Jain
S.B. State Of Rajasthan
Sanjay Bhandari S/o Shri Ram Raj Bhandari
Pankaj Bhandari
Amit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
