Allowed

Bachan Singh S/O Gujar Mal B/C Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Sept 2019CRLMB/11010/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bail application of the petitioner arrested under the Arms Act. Without expressing an opinion on the merits but deeming it just and proper, the court granted bail subject to a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner shall be enlarged on bail upon furnishing a personal bond in Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Bachan Singh S/O Gujar Mal B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11010/2019

¶3

Bachan Singh S/o Gujar Mal B/c Gurjar, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Chamandpura Ps Masalpur Dist. Karauli Raj. (At Presentin Sub Jail Hindaun City Karauli)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Mahla, PP

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

¶9

Order

¶10

04/09/2019

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 175/2019 Registered at Police Station Suroth, District Karauli for the offence under Section 3/25 of Arms Act.

¶12

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the offence alleged against the petitioner is triable by Magistrate. Counsel further submits that eleven other criminal cases were registered against the petitioner out of which five cases have been decided. Counsel further submits that the challan has already been presented in the court and conclusion of trial may take long time.

¶13

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶14

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-11010/2019]

¶17

case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶18

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Bachan Singh S/o Gujar Mal shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

¶20

JYOTI /17

Bachan Singh S/O Gujar Mal B/C Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bachan Singh S/O Gujar Mal B/C Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu @ Amar @ Durga Prasad S/O Bhairu Lal B/C Kumhar Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajesh S/O Shri Prabhu Lal B/C Lodha Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh S/O Shankar Lal B/C Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Dinesh Sharma S/O Shri Braj Mohan Sharma B/C Brahmin Vs State of Rajasthan

Rai Singh S/O Lal Chand B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Dayanand Sharma S/O Late Shri Jagannath B/C Brahmin Vs State of Rajasthan