Mehboob v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment grants bail to three petitioners arrested under Sections 8/15 of the NDPS Act. The court relied on a precedent regarding non-conformity in sample collection methods affecting the commercial quantity charge.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted on execution of personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each to the trial court.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10744/2019 Mehboob S/o Ayub Mansuri, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Madarpura, Mandsore, P.s. City Kotwali, Mandsore, District Mandsore (M.p.). (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Chittorgarh)
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 10745/2019
Radheyshyam S/o Ratan Lal Chamar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Dhundharka, P.s. Afjalpur District Mandsore (M.p.). (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Chittorgarh)
State, Through Pp
----Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10746/2019
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail be granted to persons arrested under Section 8/15 of the NDPS Act based on alleged non-conformity in sample collection procedures.
Whether the collection of narcotic drug samples from mixed bags rather than separately from each bag defeats the commercial quantity charge.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mehboob S/o Ayub Mansuri
- petitioner
Radheyshyam S/o Ratan Lal Chamar
- petitioner
Saifudeen S/o Sarajuudeen Sheikh Musalmaan
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/10744/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court